4.7 Review

Time as a Research Lens: A Conceptual Review and Research Agenda

期刊

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/01492063231215032

关键词

time; temporality; management; organization; temporal complexity; research lenses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Time is recognized as an important research perspective, but its assumptions, concepts, and boundaries vary across different fields. This diversity offers depth and relevance for research, but also hinders integration. To address this, an integrative framework is proposed, connecting and contrasting the three dominant manifestations of the temporal lens: time as resource, time as structure, and time as process. Opportunities for future research are identified by analyzing the insights of these lenses and discussing pathways for further exploration.
Time is gaining recognition as an important research perspective, yet the assumptions, concepts, and boundaries of this perspective vary greatly across different fields. This diversity suggests that time offers both significant depth and relevance as a lens for research. However, the diversity of approaches also harbors ambiguity and a lack of coherence, hindering scholars' ability to integrate insights and harness the full potential of time as a research lens. To address this issue, we review the diverse time-based assumptions, domains, and concepts in extant research. Our review reveals three dominant manifestations of the temporal lens: time as resource, time as structure, and time as process. We analyze and synthesize insights of the three lenses to offer an integrative framework to support future research. The framework informs and reveals opportunities for time-based research by foregrounding connections and contrasts among the lenses. Building on this framework, we discuss two principal pathways for future research: connecting the three lenses through the study of tensions at their interfaces, and enhancing the three lenses through the study of more complex conceptions of time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据