4.5 Article

Does training provision matter? Unravelling the impact of digital transformation on environmental sustainability

期刊

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/ITP-01-2023-0007

关键词

Digital transformation; Environmental sustainability; Training provision; Digital sustainability; Contingent resource-based view

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the impact of digital transformation on environmental sustainability, and investigates the moderating role of training provision. The findings suggest that digital transformation has a positive impact on environmental sustainability, and this effect is strengthened by training provision.
PurposeMany firms are now pursuing large-scale change initiatives to accelerate their digital transformation (DT) and sustainable development. However, the success rate of DT projects is still low, and the extent to which DT enables firms to improve environmental sustainability (ES) remains unclear. Recently, researchers have argued that DT is more about people transformation rather than technology. Based on the contingent resource-based view, this study investigates how DT influences ES and examines the moderating role of training provision (TP).Design/methodology/approachSurvey data gathered from manufacturers in China were analysed to test the proposed theoretical framework.FindingsThe results indicate that DT has a positive impact on ES, and that this effect is positively moderated by TP.Practical implicationsThe empirical findings provide insights for managers to understand the success of digital sustainability transformation requires necessary digital knowledge and skills derived from TP.Originality/valueThis study provides an initial examination of digital sustainability, which is a new stream of literature for the digital age, and further extends existing knowledge by demonstrating the importance of people (i.e. TP) in strengthening the effectiveness of DT on ES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据