4.3 Article

Analyzing the Release of Juvenile Lifers: Is There a Miller Effect?

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Review Criminology & Penology

Now with the possibility of parole: Enabling a juvenile lifer's meaningful review

Stuti S. Kokkalera et al.

Summary: Parole, as one of the least visible decision-making processes in the criminal justice system, is highly selective in terms of what is considered meaningful. This study reveals that parole boards emphasize factors such as childhood abuse, peer dependency, and self-redemption, rather than a generalized presumption of mitigated culpability and capacity for rehabilitation, when justifying release. In contrast, denial narratives selectively highlight the seriousness of the sentencing offense and the retributive requirement for longer imprisonment.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY (2023)

Article Criminology & Penology

Prosecutor Decision-Making Following Juvenile Life Without Parole Sentencing Reform

Leah Ouellet et al.

Summary: Prosecutors in the United States play a crucial role in implementing sentencing reform measures. A recent study focusing on juvenile lifers in Michigan found that prosecutors' filing decisions for resentencing were influenced by their existing decision-making schema, rather than the new sentencing policy that restricted life without parole sentences for juveniles. The study suggests that prosecutors' implementation of sentencing reform measures is constrained by their adherence to traditional conceptions of blameworthiness and dangerousness, and provides policy recommendations to address this issue.

YOUTH VIOLENCE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE (2023)

Article Criminology & Penology

Young Enough for the Maximum: Discretionary Release Decisions in the Post-Miller Era

Stuti S. Kokkalera et al.

Summary: The study found that age at time of offense is not associated with parole release, but victim and prosecutorial opposition can reduce the likelihood of release, especially for adult offenders.

CRIME & DELINQUENCY (2022)

Article Law

Racial Disparities in Lifer Parole Outcomes: The Hidden Role of Professional Evaluations

Kathryne M. Young et al.

Summary: The study found significant racial disparities in parole decisions for California lifer prisoners, with Black candidates less likely to be granted parole than white candidates. This difference was not due to varying levels of self-rehabilitation efforts between Black and white candidates, but rather to commissioners relying on evaluations from other professionals.

LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION (2022)

Article Law

How parole boards judge remorse: Relational legal consciousness and the reproduction of carceral logic

Kathryne M. Young et al.

Summary: One in seven people in prison in the US is serving a life sentence, and most of these lifers will someday be eligible for discretionary parole. But little is known about how parole board members assess remorse, a key aspect of parole decision-making. Through in-depth interviews with parole commissioners in California, the state with the largest proportion of parole-eligible lifers, this study reveals that commissioners' assessments of remorse depend on their perceptions of lifers' relationships to law and carceral logic. This highlights the importance of relational legal consciousness as a mechanism through which existing power relations are produced and reproduced in parole hearings, bridging the gap between the literatures on legal consciousness and law and emotion.

LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (2022)

Article Criminology & Penology

Women Lifers: What the United States Sentencing Commission Data Tell Us about Women Eligible for and Sentenced to Life Without Parole

Cassia Spohn et al.

Summary: This study examines the characteristics and predictors of life eligibility for women and men convicted in US District Courts. The findings suggest that black women are more likely to be eligible for life imprisonment without parole compared to white or Hispanic women. The study also highlights the importance of intersectionality in understanding the gendered sentencing pathways.

VICTIMS & OFFENDERS (2022)

Article Law

Degradation or Redemption? A Parole Board Polices a Moral Boundary

Steve Herbert

Summary: Parole boards have the power to grant early release from prison, but the decision-making process is influenced by both legal and extralegal factors. An analysis of parole board hearings in Washington State reveals that board members often emphasize the moral significance of past crimes and express skepticism about prisoner rehabilitation, resulting in the reinforcement of their criminal records. This highlights the challenges of changing societal attitudes towards convicted individuals and reducing incarceration rates, particularly in the United States.

LAW AND SOCIAL INQUIRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION (2022)

Article Criminology & Penology

Overcoming Penal Boundaries: Exploring The Evolution of Retributive Time Through Parole Decision-Making

Netanel Dagan

Summary: The dynamics of retributive punishment over time are explored through qualitative findings from parole-board chairpersons in Israel, challenging the static conceptualization of retributive time and the instrumental view of parole decision-making. The findings call for future scholarly engagement with the evolution of punishment over time, questioning the assumed strict boundaries between sentencing and post-sentencing stages.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY (2022)

Article Criminology & Penology

Representing juvenile lifers: do attorneys in parole hearings matter?

Stuti S. Kokkalera

Summary: The presence of legal representation during initial parole hearings for juvenile lifer candidates can impact the length of interval terms, highlighting the need for state-provided counsel for fairness. Findings support the necessity for more comparative research across states in this area.

JOURNAL OF CRIME & JUSTICE (2022)

Review Orthopedics

Testing the proportional hazards assumption in cox regression and dealing with possible non-proportionality in total joint arthroplasty research: methodological perspectives and review

Ilari Kuitunen et al.

Summary: The study revealed limitations in reporting details of the Cox regression model and testing the proportional hazards assumption in total joint arthroplasty research. More awareness, education, and collaboration with methodologists and statisticians are needed to improve the quality of TJA studies.

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (2021)

Article Criminology & Penology

Revisiting Parole Decision Making: Testing for the Punitive Hypothesis in a Large US Jurisdiction

E. Rely Vilcica

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY (2018)

Article Health Policy & Services

Prospects for Developmental Evidence in Juvenile Sentencing Based on Miller v. Alabama

Thomas Grisso et al.

PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW (2016)

Article Economics

Rehabilitated or Not: An Informational Theory of Parole Decisions

Dan Bernhardt et al.

JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION (2012)

Article Veterinary Sciences

Erratum

MEDICAL MYCOLOGY (2010)

Article Criminology & Penology

Parole release decisions: Impact of victim input on a representative sample of inmates

Joel M. Caplan

JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE (2010)

Article Criminology & Penology

THE ROLE OF RACE AND ETHNICITY IN PAROLE DECISIONS

Beth M. Huebner et al.

CRIMINOLOGY (2008)