4.1 Review

TEMPI syndrome: A clinical, light-microscopic and phenotypic evaluation with review of the literature

期刊

JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cup.14572

关键词

erythrocytosis; intrapulmonary shunting; monoclonal gammopathy; perinephric fluid collections; telangiectasia; vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TEMPI syndrome is a rare multisystemic disease with unknown pathogenesis and etiology. This study aimed to further characterize TEMPI syndrome through the evaluation of a skin biopsy, as skin biopsies are rarely performed in this disorder.
Background and objectives: TEMPI (telangiectasias, elevated erythropoietin and erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections, and intrapulmonaryshunting) syndrome is a rare multisystemic disease classified as a monoclonal gammopathy of cutaneous significance. The pathogenesis and etiology of TEMPIare not well known because of the rarity of this disorder. Although telangiectasias are the hallmark of this syndrome, skin biopsies are rarely performed. We aim to further characterize TEMPI syndrome through the evaluationof a skin biopsy.Methods: We reviewed the histopathology and immunophenotypic profile of a skin biopsy from a 53-year-oldwoman diagnosed with TEMPI syndrome. Other components of her syndromic complex included an IgA myeloma, elevated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and erythrocytosis.Results: A biopsy showed prominent vascular ectasia with some degree of microvascular basement membranezone thickening. Our patient had a reduction in neoplastic plasma cell burdenand clearing of her telangiectasias following myeloma directed treatment.Conclusions: TEMPI can beviewed as a reactive vascular paraneoplastic syndrome in the setting of a plasma cell dyscrasia. Elaboration of VEGF from neoplastic plasma cells is likely pathogenetically implicated and appears to be a common link that explains other vascular lesions associated with monoclonal gammopathy syndromes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据