4.5 Article

Explicating Trust-building Factors Impacting the Use of e-government Services

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/08944393231220757

关键词

e-government services; technology acceptance model; information systems success model; trust in e-government; information quality and design; Kuwait

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the factors influencing users' trust in and use of e-government services. The results show that information quality and design, as well as perceived ease of use, affect users' trust and behavioral intentions. Gender and nationality also have a significant impact on users' satisfaction with e-government services.
This study investigates the users' perception of trust-building factors influencing the use of e-government services and information, by integrating constructs identified in the technology acceptance model (TAM) with information systems (IS) success and trust models. Data was collected using a questionnaire targeted towards users of e-government services in Kuwait. The partial least squares structural equation modeling method was used to analyze 717 valid questionnaire responses. The results indicate that information quality and design (IQD) and perceived ease of use (PEU) influence individuals' trust in e-government (TEG), thereby affecting their behavioral intentions (BI). Furthermore, the results indicate an average level of the users' satisfaction and significant differences in how gender and nationality are associated with the overall satisfaction of e-government services users. The proposed framework contributes to extending models by integrating IQD (a modified construct of the IS model) and PEU (a construct of the TAM) as trust-related factors that provide better insights into the driving forces of BI and should be considered when designing and developing e-government services. Additionally, the study provides a deeper understanding of the challenges that could hinder the use of e-government systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据