4.2 Article

Supervised Machine Learning Mode for Predicting Gas-Liquid Flow Patterns in Upward Inclined Pipe

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10553-023-01618-1

关键词

drilling; gas-liquid two-phase flow; flow pattern; machine learning; well control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the use of machine learning methods for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification. Four machine learning models were tested and trained using a sample database, and the results showed that Random Forest had the highest prediction accuracy while Naive Bayes had the lowest. The machine learning method demonstrated varying levels of recognition ability for different flow patterns.
Accurate identification of gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns during oil and gas drilling is critical to analyzing bottom hole pressure, detecting overflows in time, and preventing blowout accidents. Since the gas-liquid two-phase flow has deformable interfaces, resulting in complex gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns, the existing gas-liquid two-phase flow patterns are limited in width in terms of pipe diameter and incline, leading to adaptation problems in experimental flow patterns and mechanistic models. Machine learning methods provide potential tools for solving gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification. In this paper, a sample database with 5879 data points was established by reviewing and organizing existing literature focusing on normal pressure and temperature, and air-water experimental conditions to provide a data-preparation for the relationship between gas and liquid velocities, pipe diameter and incline characteristics and flow pattern objectives. Four machine learning models, including K-Nearest Neighbor, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree and Random Forest, were investigated, and each model was trained and tested using a sample database to reveal the performance of four types of supervised machine learning methods, representing similarity, probability, inductive inference and ensemble-learning principles, for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern recognition, and the prediction accuracy was 0.86, Naive Bayes is 0.56, Decision Tree is 0.89 and Random Forest 0.97. Comprehensive analysis of each model confusion matrix shows that the machine learning method has the best recognition of dispersed bubble flow, better recognition of slug flow, and the worst recognition of churn flow among the nine flow patterns which proves the controversial nature of the mechanism model in the transition from slug flow to churn flow. This paper uses experimental data as model input features, making the machine learning-based gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification model meaningful for practical engineering applications, and also demonstrating the feasibility of using supervised machine learning methods for gas-liquid two-phase flow pattern identification at normal pressure and temperature, wide-range of pipe diameter and incline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据