4.8 Article

On the interactions between RNA and titrateable lipid layers: implications for RNA delivery with lipid nanoparticles

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nr03308b

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between cationic ionisable lipids (CIL) and nucleic acids (NAs) is influenced by pH and NA type, which affects the adsorption behavior and structure of the lipid layer. It is also found that the secondary structure of NAs has an impact on the interaction.
Characterising the interaction between cationic ionisable lipids (CIL) and nucleic acids (NAs) is key to understanding the process of RNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formation and release of NAs from LNPs. Here, we have used different surface techniques to reveal the effect of pH and NA type on the interaction with a model system of DOPC and the CIL DLin-MC3-DMA (MC3). At only 5% MC3, differences in the structure and dynamics of the lipid layer were observed. Both pH and %MC3 were shown to affect the absorption behaviour of erythropoietin mRNA, polyadenylic acid (polyA) and polyuridylic acid (polyU). The adsorbed amount of all studied NAs was found to increase with decreasing pH and increasing %MC3 but with different effects on the lipid layer, which could be linked to the NA secondary structure. For polyA at pH 6, adsorption to the surface of the layer was observed, whereas for other conditions and NAs, penetration of the NA into the layer resulted in the formation of a multilayer structure. By comparison to simulations excluding the secondary structure, differences in adsorption behaviours between polyA and polyU could be observed, indicating that the NA's secondary structure also affected the MC3-NA interactions. We have investigated the interaction between a model system of DOPC/DLin-MC3-DMA, an ionisable lipid used in lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery, with different mRNAs and shown that the adsorption behaviour depends on the mRNA secondary structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据