4.5 Article

Options for substantiating protein content claims for conventional foods

期刊

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2023-0243

关键词

protein quality; protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score; digestible indispensable amino acid score; in vitro digestibility; protein content claims

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Canada and the United States, data supporting the quality of protein is required for front-of-package protein content claims. However, the current method of measuring protein quality through animal testing is inconsistent with global efforts to reduce animal usage for regulatory purposes. This article presents four alternative options to replace animal testing for determining protein quality and encourages regulatory agencies to consider these approaches for substantiating protein content claims, especially for plant-based foods.
In Canada , the United States, front-of-package protein content claims require data to support the quality of the protein. In general, protein quality reflects the product of the amino acid composition of the food protein relative to human amino acid requirements and a measure of digestibility. The currently accepted method in both jurisdictions is the protein digestibility -corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) that requires the measurement of true fecal protein (nitrogen) digestibility. The latter must be measured in vivo using a rat model. This requirement for animal testing is inconsistent with international efforts to reduce the usage of animals in testing for regulatory purposes. The current commentary positions four options to remove the need to use animal testing for determining protein quality, when considering protein content claim substantiation. These op-tions include (i) a focus on protein quantity alone; (ii) the use of the amino acid score alone, with no correction for digestibility; (iii) the use of a fixed digestibility coefficient to estimate protein quality; and (iv) the use of in vitro methods to measure protein and/or amino acid digestibility. The relative merits and deficiencies of the options are positioned with the goal of encouraging dialogue within the regulatory agencies to move towards alternative approaches for substantiating protein content claims on foods, including those derived from plant-based sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据