3.8 Article

Adjustments to and innovations in the implementation of qualitative research with people with disabilities: the case of Bangladesh

期刊

DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2023.2286196

关键词

People with disabilities; people with disabilities in tradition-bound developing societies; qualitative research; innovations in research tools and processes; Bangladesh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Empowerment of people with disabilities is crucial for human rights and inclusive development. However, in Bangladesh, reaching out and gathering experiences of people with disabilities who face multiple challenges is difficult due to social taboos and stigma. This article explores the challenges faced and adjustments made through qualitative research, highlighting the researcher's approach of continuous learning, networking, and sensitivity to the well-being of the interviewees.
Empowerment of people with disabilities is an important aspect of commitment to human rights and inclusive development. However, the tasks of reaching out and engaging with people with disabilities and gathering and articulating sensitively the lived experiences of people with disabilities who encounter multiple challenges - physical, social, and cultural - is anything but easy. These challenges are particularly daunting in Bangladesh, where disability is also taboo and often seen as a social and economic burden. Based on a four-year research project with people with disabilities in Bangladesh, the article highlights the challenges of reaching out and the adjustments and innovations that have been applied through qualitative research. The researcher employed a probe-reach-out-learn-and-apply-as-you-go approach, which included extensive networking, extreme sensitivity, extensive attention to the issues of dignity and health of the interviewees, continuous attention and adjustments to interview conditions, and to the researcher's own emotions and health challenges during and following the interview phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据