3.8 Article

Locked out or let in? Learning from victim- survivors' remote help-seeking experiences during COVID-19

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BRISTOL UNIV PRESS & POLICY PRESS
DOI: 10.1332/23986808Y2023D000000007

关键词

COVID-19; domestic violence; remote service delivery; service use; lived experience; gender

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As COVID-19 spread globally, victims of domestic and family violence faced challenges in accessing support services due to lockdown measures. A study in Australia found that although remote support had its challenges, it also improved accessibility for some victims. Therefore, a hybrid service model that combines remote and in-person support should be retained to cater to diverse victim needs and communities.
As COVID-19 traversed the world, public health control measures introduced to reduce the spread of the virus restricted people's movements and confined many victim-survivors to homes with their abusers. These restrictions raised challenges for services providing support to victims of domestic and family violence (DFV) leading many to rapidly pivot to remote service delivery models. Much of the existing knowledge about victim-survivor service use during COVID-19 is based on the reflections and observations of practitioners and service providers. This article centres on the experiences and expertise of victim-survivors, using findings from an Australian study that investigated victim-survivors' use of DFV services during lockdowns. Our exploratory survey data revealed that lockdowns created conditions in homes that made it challenging to receive support remotely with concerns about privacy looming large. At the same time, several victim-survivors reported that the widescale shift to remote service provision during lockdowns improved the accessibility of support services. Positive experiences of remote service provision during COVID-19 provide support for the retention of hybrid service models in the future to cater for diverse victim-survivor needs and communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据