4.2 Article

Black extras and actors in Francoist cinema

期刊

ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2023.2289136

关键词

Afro iberia; Francoist cinema; black extras; black actors; racializing assemblage; self-exoticism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the presence of Africans in Spanish filmography before 1975, which has been unnoticed. It highlights the fact that Africans were often portrayed by African American and Afro-Latin actors or by actors in blackface, perpetuating racial stereotypes. The article also examines the racial hierarchy and exoticism underlying Spanish cinema and the exceptional conditions that allowed African actors to portray African characters.
While colonial cinema has been studied as an epic and propagandistic text of the Franco Regime (Elena, 2010. La Llamada de africa, Estudios Sobre el Cine Espanol Colonial. Barcelona: Bellaterra), the presence of Africans in Spanish filmography before 1975 has gone unnoticed. Few saw their names in a movie's credits. When an African had some lines due to script requirements, the role was offered to African American and Afro-Latin actors, or it was performed by sinister blackface actors without the slightest qualm. In this game of masks, the African Negro is at the bottom of an absurd melanocratic classification that dissociates race and color. Invisible as mute bodies and faceless ghosts, the extras, a non-detachable part of the set, do not act but are acted out (Didi-Huberman, 2012. Peuples Exposes, Peuples Figurants. L'oe il de l'histoire, 4. Paris: Minuit). In this article we examine the hierarchy underlying a racializing assemblage (Weheliye, 2014. Habeas viscus. Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Duke University Press) indissociable from Spanish (self)exoticism, as well as the conditions that exceptionally allow the presence of African characters played by African actors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据