3.8 Article

Nature-based tourism and climate favourability: a case of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia

期刊

TOURISM RECREATION RESEARCH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02508281.2023.2289703

关键词

Nature-based tourism; marine tourism; HCI; climate change; climate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the impact of climate on tourism using the Great Barrier Reef in Australia as a case study. The results show that the weather favorability at the Great Barrier Reef is high and has improved over time due to climate change. Past tourism participation and climate can predict travel decisions, and the climate favorability in summer and spring seasons is valuable to tourism performance.
Nature-based tourism at the Great Barrier Reef in Australia is a salient contributor to the national economy. Nature-based tourism involves travel to a destination dependent on the natural environment for recreation. Nature-based tourism is influenced by weather, climate, and over the span of decades, climate change. However, there is a salient knowledge gap where the interrelations between climate and tourism at the Great Barrier Reef remain understudied. Accordingly, this study present the case of the Great Barrier Reef to investigate (1) climate favourability, (2) changes to long-term weather (i.e. climate) as a process of climate change, (3) interrelations between climate and travel decisions, and (4) the value of climate favourabiltiy to tourism performance. Weather favourability is calculated using the Holiday Climate Index (HCI), and the dependent variable is airport arrivals (i.e. a travel decision). Results demonstrate (1) 96.3% of the months had 'good' to 'ideal' weather favourability, (2) annual HCI improved towards 'ideal' as a process of climate change (1984-2021), (3) past tourism participation and climate were predictive of travel decisions dependent on meteorological season, and (4) the value of climate favourability in the summer and spring seasons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据