4.0 Article

Measuring the Complexity of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Challenges for Adolescents in Canada

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/07342829231221851

关键词

secondary education/adolescence; social and educational environment; measurement; student engagement; education program and leadership; self-regulated learning; academic challenges

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the complexity of self-regulated learning and academic challenges for adolescents using a self-report measure. The results indicate that the SRL-PSD instrument is reliable and valid in measuring adolescents' SRL practices and academic challenges, and there are significant correlations between different types of SRL practices and academic challenges. Additionally, SRL practices are positively associated with school engagement, while academic challenges are negatively associated with school engagement.
Research that uses self-report measures to examine the complexity of self-regulated learning (SRL) and academic challenges for adolescents is limited. This study examined the psychometric property of the Self-Regulated Learning Profile and Self-Diagnostic (SRL-PSD) instrument and addressed the multi-components of SRL and academic challenges for adolescents. Participants were 358 adolescents from a Canadian middle school. The subscales of SRL-PSD were administered to students through LimeSurvey during a 25-min instructional session over two days. Results demonstrated the SRL-PSD was a reliable and valid self-report instrument to measure adolescents' SRL practices and academic challenges. Also, all types of SRL practices and academic challenges were significantly intercorrelated. Additionally, all types of SRL practices were positively associated with school engagement, whereas all types of academic challenges were negatively associated with school engagement. Overall, this study provides a validated self-report measure for educators and researchers to examine adolescents' SRL practices and academic challenges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据