4.7 Article

Managing transition metal interferences during chemical vapor generation using the hydrolysis products of tetrahydridoborate: a proof-of-concept study

期刊

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ja00381g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of BH intermediates as derivatization reagents significantly improves the tolerance to interference from transition metal ions in the generation of SbH3 and BiH3, and shows high tolerance in a wide range of acidity. The method has been successfully applied to the determination of Sb and Bi in complex samples, providing further understanding of the chemical behavior of borohydrides.
The negative impact of liquid phase interferences of transition metals has plagued chemical vapor generation with tetrahydridoborate since its introduction, which was more than fifty years ago. Herein, the interference from selected transition metal ions in the generation of SbH3 and BiH3 was investigated using the hydrolysis products of NaBH4-hydridoboron intermediates (BH)-as derivatization reagents instead of NaBH4. The BH intermediates were simply generated on-line in a pre-hydrolysis coil of the instrumental set-up. Compared to NaBH4, the use of BH intermediates allowed for significantly improved tolerance to the interference of Ni(ii), Co(ii), and Cu(ii) (tolerance limit of >= 100 mg L-1) for Bi and Sb determination in the absence of any masking agents and in a wide range of acidity. Their applicability to real complex samples was successfully demonstrated by the determination of Sb and Bi in steel and copper standard reference materials. Beyond the analytical application, this work aims to play a part in the comprehension of borohydride chemical behaviour, which is still not completely understood. In this work, the different reactivity of BH4- and its hydrolysis intermediates towards analytical substrates (Sb and, Bi) and interfering metal ions was is studied for (ultra)trace-level quantifications in challenging matrices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据