4.7 Article

Metabolomics reveals the mechanism of action of meropenem and amikacin combined in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1327452

关键词

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; metabolomics; meropenem; amikacin; LC-MS/MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolomic analysis showed that the combination therapy of meropenem/amikacin significantly altered relevant metabolites involved in bacterial cell membrane and cell wall synthesis, as well as interfered with multiple metabolic pathways essential for the survival of P. aeruginosa.
The treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection often involves the combined use of beta-lactam and aminoglycoside antibiotics. In this study, we employed metabolomic analysis to investigate the mechanism responsible for the synergistic activities of meropenem/amikacin combination therapy against multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa strains harboring OXA-50 and PAO genes. Antibiotic concentrations for meropenem (2 mg/L) monotherapy, amikacin (16 mg/L) monotherapy, and meropenem/amikacin (2/16 mg/L) combination therapy were selected based on clinical breakpoint considerations. Metabolomic analysis revealed significant alterations in relevant metabolites involved in bacterial cell membrane and cell wall synthesis within 15 min of combined drug administration. These alterations encompassed various metabolic pathways, including fatty acid metabolism, peptidoglycan synthesis, and lipopolysaccharide metabolism. Furthermore, at 1 h and 4 h, the combination therapy exhibited significant interference with amino acid metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, and central carbon metabolism pathways, including the tricarboxylic acid cycle and pentose phosphate pathway. In contrast, the substances affected by single drug administration at 1 h and 4 h demonstrated a noticeable reduction. Meropenem/amikacin combination resulted in notable perturbations of metabolic pathways essential for survival of P. aeruginosa, whereas monotherapies had comparatively diminished impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据