4.7 Article

Flocculating fine cuttings particles suspended within partially hydrolysed polyacrylamide (PHPA) solutions used as drilling fluids in mineral exploration

期刊

MINERALS ENGINEERING
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2023.108510

关键词

Clarification; Drilling fluid; Flocculant; Centrifugation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High molecular weight partially hydrolysed polyacrylamide (PHPA) is commonly used in mineral exploration drilling to increase fluid viscosity and help maintain the suspension of fine particles. However, clarifying these suspensions can be difficult, and previous studies have found that anionic flocculants are ineffective. This study confirmed that nonionic flocculants can successfully aggregate the particles, indicating that the charged tails of adsorbed PHPA prevent anionic flocculants from accessing the particle surfaces.
Aqueous solutions of high molecular weight partially hydrolysed polyacrylamide (PHPA) are used in mineral exploration drilling to increase fluid viscosity and thereby help maintain the suspension of fine cuttings being brought to the surface. However, clarifying such suspensions prior to drilling fluid recycling can be problematic, leading to recirculating particle loads that can impact on drilling performance. Total particle encapsulation by adsorbed polymer is assumed to stabilize suspensions, thereby preventing subsequent flocculation. Batch testing with aggregation monitored in real-time by focused beam reflectance measurement (FBRM) confirmed anionic flocculants were ineffective, but significant aggregation was achieved with a nonionic product. Field trials dosing a nonionic flocculant in advance of a decanter centrifuge required higher dosages, but still consistently reduced centrate solids by similar to 50 %. This indicates cuttings particle surfaces may in fact be accessible for flocculant absorption and particle bridging, but the charged tails of adsorbed PHPA prevent any such access by similar anionic flocculants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据