4.7 Article

Employing low dissolved oxygen strategy to simultaneously improve nutrient removal, mitigate membrane fouling, and reduce energy consumption in an AAO-MBR system: Fine bubble or coarse bubble?

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104602

关键词

Membrane bioreactors; Low dissolved oxygen; Bubble size; Fouling control; Energy consumption; Microbial community

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that fine bubble aeration in membrane bioreactors (MBR) can better control membrane fouling and reduce energy consumption. However, compared to fine bubble aeration, coarse bubble aeration released more proteins and polysaccharides, resulting in a decrease in functional bacteria and enzymes involved in nitrogen and phosphorus pathways.
The high energy consumption associated with aeration, which is a widely used hydrodynamic method to mitigate membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBR), poses a significant challenge to the widespread application of aerated MBR. In this study, low dissolved oxygen was applied to optimize the overall performance and reduce energy consumption in an anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic MBR (AAO-MBR) under fine and coarse bubble aeration conditions. Coarse bubble aeration exhibited better membrane fouling control, but induced releasing more proteins and polysaccharides in mixed liquor than that in fine bubble aeration. Coarse bubble aeration resulted in a decrease in the relative abundance of function bacteria, and there was a corresponding drop in enzymes involved in the nitrogen and phosphorus pathways. Furthermore, the average total specific energy demand (0.45 +/- 0.02 kW & sdot;h/d) and total carbon emissions (0.32 +/- 0.01 kg/d) of coarse bubble aeration was remarkably higher than that of fine bubble aeration (0.35 +/- 0.01 kW & sdot;h/d and 0.25 +/- 0.02 kg/d). Our results demonstrate that the fine bubble aeration in low dissolved oxygen-based AAO-MBR can optimize the overall performance and reduce energy consumption, thereby making it a more viable option for the wastewater treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据