4.4 Article

GDP dissociation inhibitor 1 (GDI1) attenuates β-amyloid-induced neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's diseases

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 818, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137564

关键词

AD; GDI1; Neurotoxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that GDI1 serves as a potential diagnostic biomarker for AD and inhibition of GDI1 can attenuate Aβ-induced neurotoxicity. The findings offer new insights for the treatment of AD.
Objective: beta-Amyloid (A beta) induced neurotoxicity is an implicated mechanism in Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study focused on the role of GDP dissociation inhibitor 1 (GDI1) in A beta-induced neurotoxicity.Methods: Data from the GEO database for AD-related datasets GSE140829, GSE63061, GSE36980, and GSE60360 were downloaded and identified common differentially expressed genes (coDEGs). The mRNA levels of GDI1 in the serum of AD patients were analyzed by RT-qPCR. ROC curve evaluated the diagnostic value. A beta 25-35 induced SH-SY5Y cells to construct an AD cell model. CCK-8, flow cytometry, and ELISA assay were used to analyze cell viability, apoptosis, and concentrations of inflammatory factors. KEGG enrichment was employed to analyze the signal pathway of targets from GDI1 in the AD.Results: The GEO database identifies coDEGs including GDI1. GDI1 is generally elevated in serum from AD patients as well as in A beta-induced SH-SY5Y cells. GDI1 has 77.97% sensitivity and 84.44% specificity to identify AD patients from controls. A beta induced decreased cell viability, increased apoptosis, and promoted over-secretion of inflammatory cytokines, but they were all partially weakened by reduced GDI1. What's more, the GDI1 interacting gene and AD target gene were co-enriched on Endocytosis and MAPK signaling pathway.Conclusion: Elevated GDI1 is a potential diagnostic biomarker for AD and that inhibition of GDI1 attenuates A beta induced neurotoxicity in AD. Our study offers new horizons for AD treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据