4.6 Article

Modeling underwriting risk: A copula regression analysis on US property-casualty insurance byline loss ratios

期刊

PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL
卷 83, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102206

关键词

Liability risk management; R5 risk; Underwriting risk; Multivariate loss distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a method to evaluate underwriting risks for U.S. property-casualty insurance company using a byline multivariate framework. The proposed regression system with copula structure estimates the dynamics and dependences of by-line loss ratio changes. The choice of copula structure and marginal estimation method affects the model's performance in stress testing of catastrophic events. These findings help insurers and regulators evaluate their capital requirements more precisely and reduce liability-side risk.
This article evaluates underwriting risks for U.S. property-casualty insurance company using a byline multivariate framework. We propose a regression system with copula structure to estimate the dynamics and dependences of by-line loss ratio changes. The dynamics are characterized by autoregressive, macroeconomic, and line-specific variables. The dependences are characterized by symmetric, asymmetric, and vine copulas to manifest the contemporaneous risk. Both positive and negative dependence of loss ratio changes are found, and the lines of business contribute distinct diversification effects from the Risk-based Capital (RBC) R5 formula suggested. Based on empirical studies of industry-wide data, we confirm that the choice of copula structure and marginal estimation method affects the model's performance in the stress testing of catastrophic events. The proposed approach can be regarded as an internal model calculating the diversification benefits across business lines, based on a statistical hypothesis in contrast to a regulatory base. These findings help insurers and regulators to evaluate their capital requirements more precisely and reduce liability-side risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据