4.7 Article

The bright side of outside market entry with manufacturer encroachment

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2023.103358

关键词

Supplier encroachment; Dual marketing channels; Downstream entry; Inter-brand competition; Intra-brand competition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study discusses the potential benefits for downstream retailers to invite new entrants when facing encroachment from their upstream manufacturers. The findings suggest that manufacturers may choose to collaborate with retailers, treating them as strategic partners to restrict the market share of new entrants or alleviate downstream competition. On the other hand, retailers may intentionally prompt the entry of new firms to trigger inter-brand competition and secure favorable procurement conditions.
This study discusses the possible benefits of inviting entrants for downstream retailers when facing the encroachment of their upstream manufacturers. We consider a model comprising one retailer, one manufacturer, and one potential entrant. The manufacturer decides whether to encroach or supply the retailer; The retailer decides whether to help a third-party firm overcome its entry barrier. We show that whether firms compete in quantity or price, the manufacturer, in the presence of an entrant, may choose to supply the retailer even if the retailer does not offer any advantages in terms of cost efficiency in retailing or channel differentiation. This is because, in such a scenario, the manufacturer treats the retailer as a strategic collaborator to either restrict the entrant's market share or alleviate the downstream competition. In other words, triggering the intra-brand competition against the retailer may help the manufacturer perform better in the inter-brand competition against the entrant. On the other hand, the retailer may intentionally prompt entry to trigger inter-brand competition to avoid being foreclosed by the manufacturer and obtain a favorable procurement condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据