4.7 Article

Evaluation of machine learning method in genomic selection for growth traits of Pacific white shrimp

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 581, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.740376

关键词

Growth traits; Genomic selection; Auto-machine learning; Prediction accuracy; Litopeneaus vannamei

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the heritability and genetic correlation of two growth traits in Pacific white shrimp and evaluated the genomic prediction using different genomic selection models. The results showed that the NeuralNet model had the highest prediction accuracy and better prospects for predicting shrimp growth traits.
The Pacific white shrimp is one of the most important species in the aquaculture industry worldwide, and the growth is regarded as primary trait for selective breeding programmes. In this study, the heritability and genetic correlation of two growth traits, including body length (BL) and the ratio of abdomen length to cephalothorax length (AL/CL) were analyzed, and the genomic prediction based on different genomic selection models including machine learning method were evaluated. The heritabilities of BL and AL/CL were 0.25 +/- 0.04 and 0.07 +/- 0.03, respectively. The two phenotypes showed moderate negative correlations (-0.70 +/- 0.14). Com-parison of the different prediction models showed that NeuralNet had the highest prediction accuracy. The prediction accuracy of NeuralNet increased by about 10% compared to GBLUP. Furthermore, NeuralNet pre-sented the highest prediction accuracy under different marker densities, and the prediction accuracy using 1000 SNPs was similar to that estimated by total SNPs. When comparing multi-trait models (MTM) and single-trait models (STM), NeuralNet outperformed the other methods, which increased prediction accuracy by around 30%. Overall, the NeuralNet model may have better application prospects for genomic selection breeding in shrimp. These results provide a strong basis for accelerating the application of genomic selection breeding in shrimp improvement programmes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据