4.4 Article

Multipaths' statistics for scatterers with inverted elliptic-parabolic spatial density around the mobile

期刊

PHYSICAL COMMUNICATION
卷 62, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.phycom.2023.102235

关键词

Channel estimation; Geometric channel modeling; Multipaths; Macrocell; Fading channels

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the joint and marginal probability densities of multipaths' angles-of-arrival (AOA) and times-of-arrival (TOA) at the cellular base station are derived. A novel assumption is made where scatterers are assumed to be located in an elliptical region instead of a circular region to better model the elliptical footprint around the mobile station. The proposed model shows a better fit to empirical AOA data compared to existing models.
The joint and marginal probability densities of multipaths' angles-of-arrival (AOA) and times-of-arrival (TOA) at the cellular base station are developed in closed form in this paper. Unlike the general simplification assumption in the open literature in which the scatterers are assumed to be located in a circular region for non-uniform spatial densities, the scatterers in this paper are assumed to be located in an elliptical region to properly model the elliptical footprint around the mobile station from the elevated base station with directional antenna. The inverted elliptic-parabolic spatial density was adopted to model the non-uniform distribution of the scatterers around the mobile. The uplink's AOA-TOA joint distributions, AOA and TOA marginal distributions were analytically derived in closed form. How the eccentricity of the elliptical scatterer region affects the probability density functions is discussed. Furthermore, the derived AOA marginal distribution is compared to that of the elliptic conic and inverted parabolic models. The proposed model is shown to have better least-squares fit to some empirical AOA data compared to the elliptic conic and inverted parabolic models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据