3.8 Article

COVID's long shadow: How SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 severity, and vaccination status affect long-term cognitive performance and health

期刊

BIOLOGY METHODS & PROTOCOLS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biomethods/bpad038

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; cognitive performance; cognition; mental health; long-term effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

COVID-19 infection and severity have negative impacts on patients' health and cognitive performance, while vaccination is associated with higher intelligence and precision of information processing. Age is associated with COVID-19 severity, with younger individuals more likely to contract the virus and older individuals more likely to have severe illness and receive vaccination.
COVID-19 affects a variety of organs and systems of the body including the central nervous system. Recent research has shown that COVID-19 survivors often experience neurological and psychiatric complications that can last for months after infection. We conducted a large Internet study using online tests to analyze the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 severity, and vaccination on health, intelligence, memory, and information processing precision and speed in a cohort of 4445 subjects. We found that both SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity were associated with negative impacts on patients' health. Furthermore, we observed a negative association between COVID-19 severity and cognitive performance. Younger participants had a higher likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 contraction, while the elderly had a higher likelihood of severe COVID-19 and vaccination. The association between age and COVID-19 severity was primarily mediated by older participants' impaired long-term health. Vaccination was positively associated with intelligence and the precision of information processing. However, the positive association between vaccination and intelligence was likely mediated by achieved education, which was itself strongly associated with the likelihood of being vaccinated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据