4.3 Article

Working upstream: A statewide analysis of individual and contextual risk factors for future juvenile justice involvement among youth receiving prevention services

期刊

CRIMINOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1745-9133.12656

关键词

community context; early intervention; juvenile justice; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the relationship between risk factors and future involvement in the juvenile justice system for youth in Florida. The findings suggest that educational deficits are among the most influential risk factors, especially for older youth. Additionally, neighborhood disadvantage directly affects system involvement, but only for youth under 12.
Research SummaryJuvenile justice agencies are increasing their emphasis on early intervention and prevention services as a growing body of research evinces their effectiveness and cost efficiency. The present study analyzed the relationship between individual risk factors, contextual risk factors, and future juvenile justice involvement for 30,328 Florida youth residing in 3309 census tracts served by prevention programs. A series of two-level logistic regressions indicated that several distinct criminological domains (e.g., aggression, relationships, family, substance use, and attitudes/behaviors) predict future juvenile justice system involvement. However, education-related risk factors are among the most consequential for all youth, especially older youth. Concerning community context, neighborhood disadvantage directly affects system involvement, but only for youth under 12.Policy ImplicationsThese findings indicate the importance of addressing highly consequential risk factors-especially educational deficits-of youth in early intervention and prevention programs while also recognizing the impact of their social environments. Agencies attempting to work upstream with prevention services may benefit from prioritizing educational services and allocating resources to highly disadvantaged communities for early intervention programming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据