4.1 Article

A Comparison of Mental Health Symptoms among Adults Who Vape Nicotine, Cannabis, or Both

期刊

SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2294956

关键词

Nicotine; cannabis; vape; mental health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that dual use of cannabis and nicotine vapes is associated with worse mental health symptoms compared to single substance use. Younger age and being married were associated with higher symptoms of depression and stress among dual users, while holding a medical cannabis card was associated with higher anxiety symptoms.
ObjectivesDual use of combustible cannabis and nicotine is related to worse mental health symptoms (MHS); however, little is known about MHS among those who vape cannabis and nicotine. The current study aimed to determine if dual use of cannabis and nicotine vapes is associated with worse MHS compared to single use and to identify correlates of MHS for dual users.MethodsWe used Amazon Mechanical Turk to survey adults (N = 492) who used nicotine or cannabis vapes in the past 30 days on stress, anxiety, depression, vape use behaviors and sociodemographic information. We conducted hierarchical linear regressions to compare MHS between dual vs. single substance vape use and to identify correlates of MHS, including sociodemographic variables and vape use characteristics.ResultsThe final sample was 37.6% female, 87.6% White, and 11% Hispanic/Latinx with a mean age of 34.15 years. After controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and combustible product use, dual users had significantly higher mean MHS severity than single users. For dual users, younger age and being married were associated with higher symptoms of depression and stress. Holding a medical cannabis card was associated with higher anxiety symptoms.ConclusionThe findings suggest that dual use of cannabis and nicotine vapes is associated with worse MHS severity compared to single substance use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据