4.6 Article

Myofiber development during embryonic to neonatal development in duck breeds differing in muscle growth rates

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 403-413

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60949-7

关键词

duck; myofiber development; MyoD gene; gene expression

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31172194]
  2. Key Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province, China [BE2014362, BE2012460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about the muscle developmental patterns during embryonic to neonatal development in ducks. We investigated the developmental patterns in the lateral gastrocnemius muscles of Gaoyou and Jinding ducks differing in their muscle growth rates during the final stages of egg incubation and the first week after hatching. Expression of the MyoD gene was quantified by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The average cross-sectional area and diameter of the fibers increased from embryonic day 21 (E21), peaking at E27, and then declining slightly 7 d after hatching. The density of the fibers decreased initially but increased after hatching in both breeds and sexes. The within-breed variation in muscle fiber-type composition was greater than the average variation between the breeds. Overall, the percentage of type I fibers increased and that of type Ilb fibers decreased consistently. However, the percentage of type Ila fibers was almost constant as development proceeded in both duck breeds. The profiles of MyoD mRNA expression were similar in both breeds, and a significantly positive relationship was observed between the expression of MyoD and the percentage of type Ilb fibers. This study firstly revealed the characteristics of duck muscle development and differences between the two breeds differing in growth rates. Moreover, type Ilb fibers might convert to type I fibers in the lateral gastrocnemius, while MyoD may potentially function in controlling the muscle fiber phenotype during the secondary myogenesis of muscle development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据