4.5 Article

A comparative analysis of complementary therapies use among patients attending diabetic clinics in Taiwan: 2007 vs. 2023

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-04299-9

关键词

Diabetes; Complementary and alternative medicine; Comparison

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comparative study in Taiwan examined the differences in the use of complementary therapies among diabetic patients attending clinics for follow-up treatment between 2007 and 2023. The study found a significant increase in the usage of nutritional supplements, while other therapies showed a decrease. The disclosure rate of complementary therapy use to healthcare professionals remained low.
BackgroundWe conducted a comparative study to examine the differences in the use of complementary therapies (CT) among patients who attended diabetic clinics for follow-up treatment between 2007 and 2023 in Taiwan.MethodsThis study employed a cross-sectional survey design to recruit individuals with diabetes from two regions (northern and southern) of Taiwan. A total of 183 and 307 participants were included in the surveys of 2007 and 2023, respectively. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 28.0 to compare the survey results between the two time periods.ResultsAmong the various CTs, nutritional supplements remained the most prevalent, with a significant increase in usage from 68.3% in 2007 to 89.9% in 2023. Conversely, other therapies, such as Chinese herbal medicines, manipulative-based therapies, supernatural healings, and bioelectromagnetic-based therapies, demonstrated a significant decrease in usage between the two time periods. Furthermore, the disclosure rate of CT use to healthcare professionals remained persistently low, with only 24.6% in 2007 and a slight increase to 30.3% in 2023.ConclusionThe significant rise in the use of nutritional supplements in conjunction with conventional medicine, without adequate monitoring and guidance from healthcare professionals, poses a substantial risk of unregulated blood sugar control, compromised diabetes management, and potential harm to health outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据