Climate Justice and Political Feasibility

This article argues that rising economic inequality and the decline in political trust across Western countries have systematic normative implications for Western governments' pursuit of climate justice. The article argues that it is an essential but neglected task of nonideal political theory to identify political feasibility constraints on the pursuit of climate justice and reflect on how to overcome them. The article identifies two feasibility constraints in contemporary Western countries, the inequality constraint and the legitimation constraint, as important elements of a nonideal theory of climate justice. It argues that the French Gilets Jaunes (yellow vests) movement arose as a form of bottom-up motivational resistance to President Macron's decarbonization policies, precisely because those policies did not take sufficient heed of the inequality and legitimation constraints. Furthermore, the article sketches elements of a roadmap for a feasible pathway for Western governments to decarbonize and observe their citizens' duties of climate justice and argues that the framework of feasibility constraints offers a coherent, novel and urgent rationale for adopting redistributive measures such as the Carbon Fee and Dividend and participatory-democratic measures such as Citizen Assemblies as component parts of a feasible pathway to a decarbonized economy.

Automated summary

This article argues that rising economic inequality and declining political trust have normative implications for Western governments' pursuit of climate justice. The inequality constraint and the legitimation constraint are identified as important elements in a nonideal theory of climate justice. The French Yellow Vests movement is seen as a form of resistance to decarbonization policies that did not address these constraints. The article suggests that redistributive and participatory-democratic measures are necessary for a feasible pathway to a decarbonized economy.