4.7 Article

Monitoring of the post-tensile structures camber using the terrestrial close-range photogrammetry

期刊

OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
卷 171, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110285

关键词

Post tension; Photogrammetry; Laser scanner; Camera; Calibration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces the application of digital measuring techniques, specifically Digital Close Range Photogrammetry (DCRP), in the detection of deformation in post-tensioned structural elements (PTSEs). The use of digital equipment and a terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) allows for highly accurate monitoring of PTSE camber, with deviations not exceeding 0.01 mm.
Post-Tensioned Structural Elements (PTSEs) are used in many modern constructions projects as a versatile form of the pre-stressed technique because of the efficiency of the durability properties and the highest resistance if compared with their counterparts. This paper presents an application of using digital measuring techniques in the field of deformation detection by using Digital Close Range Photogrammetry (DCRP), which is one of the most nowadays important sciences that are used in many engineering fields and applications. DCRP techniques have been developed by taking the advantage of the technological advances in the field of optics, laser devices, and the applied mathematical models of computer vision such as the Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) and the Direct Linear Transform (DLT). The scope of this paper is how to use the digital equipment to achieve the highest possible accuracy in a fraction of 1.00 mm of the PTSE camber monitoring through the commercial digital calibrated camera and Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS). The accuracy of the results of the DCRP technique has been proven by a laser total station. The final statistics indicate the deviation of the results compared to the coded designed models of the experimental PTSEs, deviations did not exceed 0.01 mm as a maximum difference.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据