4.8 Article

Enhanced simultaneous removal of phosphate and ammonium from swine wastewater using magnetic magnesium-loaded Chinese herbal medicine residues: Performance, mechanism, and resource utilization

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130103

关键词

Adsorption; Nutrient recovery; Biomass waste; Wastewater treatment; Struvite precipitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic magnesium-loaded Chinese herbal medicine residues (MM-TCMRs) were prepared for simultaneous removal and recovery of phosphate and ammonium from wastewater. The MM-TCMRs exhibited larger surface areas and rougher structures, and could be separated by adjusting a magnetic field. The adsorption of phosphate and ammonium by MM-TCMRs followed the pseudo-second-order model, with high maximum adsorption capacities. Furthermore, the MM-TCMRs were found to positively impact soil fertility and alfalfa growth.
Magnetic magnesium (Mg)-loaded Chinese herbal medicine residues (MM-TCMRs) were fabricated to simultaneously remove and recover phosphate and ammonium from wastewater. The MM-TCMRs exhibited larger specific surfaces and rougher structures with massive spherical particles than those of original residues. They could be separated by adjusting the magnetic field. The phosphate and ammonium adsorption by MM-TCMRs were matched with the pseudo-second-order model, while the Langmuir model yielded the maximum adsorption capacities of 635.35 and 615.57 mg g-1, respectively. Struvite precipitation on the MM-TCMRs surface was the primary removal mechanism with electrostatic attraction, ligand exchange, intra-particle diffusion, and ion exchange also involved. The recyclability of MM-TCMRs confirmed their good structural stability. More importantly, the nutrient-loaded MM-TCMRs enhanced alfalfa growth and improved soil fertility in planting experiments. Collectively, the MM-TCMRs are promising candidates for nutrient removal and recovery from wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据