4.1 Article

RISE: an open-source architecture for interdisciplinary and reproducible human-robot interaction research

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1245501

关键词

human-robot dialog; HRI studies; scenario management; explainability; Wizard of Oz; autonomous HRI; framework

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the RISE architecture for designing human-robot dialogs and conducting Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) studies. The architecture aims to support interdisciplinary research, reproducibility of research results, and accessibility for other researchers in the field of HRI.
In this article, we present RISE-a Robotics Integration and Scenario-Management Extensible-Architecture-for designing human-robot dialogs and conducting Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) studies. In current HRI research, interdisciplinarity in the creation and implementation of interaction studies is becoming increasingly important. In addition, there is a lack of reproducibility of the research results. With the presented open-source architecture, we aim to address these two topics. Therefore, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various existing tools from different sub-fields within robotics. Requirements for an architecture can be derived from this overview of the literature, which 1) supports interdisciplinary research, 2) allows reproducibility of the research, and 3) is accessible to other researchers in the field of HRI. With our architecture, we tackle these requirements by providing a Graphical User Interface which explains the robot behavior and allows introspection into the current state of the dialog. Additionally, it offers controlling possibilities to easily conduct Wizard of Oz studies. To achieve transparency, the dialog is modeled explicitly, and the robot behavior can be configured. Furthermore, the modular architecture offers an interface for external features and sensors and is expandable to new robots and modalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据