4.5 Article

10. Role of high dimensional technology in preeclampsia (omics in preeclampsia)

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102427

关键词

preeclampsia; omics; genomics; epigenomics; transcriptomics; Proteomics; Metabolomics; microbiomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disease with an unknown precise cause. Multi-omics approaches have been used to study the molecular mechanisms of preeclampsia, and various genetic variants, altered gene expressions, potential biomarkers, and metabolic changes have been identified. Microbiomics studies have also found dysbiosis in the microbiota of pregnant women with preeclampsia. Further research is needed to integrate and translate these findings into clinical practice.
Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disease that has no known precise cause. Integrative biology approach based on multi-omics has been applied to identify upstream pathways and better understand the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. At DNA level, genomics and epigenomics studies have revealed numerous genetic variants associated with preeclampsia, including those involved in regulating blood pressure and immune response. Transcriptomics analyses have revealed altered expression of genes in preeclampsia, particularly those related to inflammation and angiogenesis. At protein level, proteomics studies have identified potential biomarkers for preeclampsia diagnosis and prediction in addition to revealing the main pathophysiological pathways involved in this disease. At metabolite level, metabolomics has highlighted altered lipid and amino acid metabolisms in preeclampsia. Finally, microbiomics studies have identified dysbiosis in the gut and vaginal microbiota in pregnant women with preeclampsia. Overall, omics technologies have improved our understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms underlying preeclampsia. However, further research is warranted to fully integrate and translate these omics findings into clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据