4.8 Article

Ultrathin nanolayer constituted by a natural polysaccharide achieves egg-box structured SnO2 nanoparticles toward efficient and stable perovskite solar cells

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.109111

关键词

Perovskite solar cells; egg-box structure; SnO2 nanoparticles; Charge transport dynamics; Bottom-up holistic passivation; Tensile stress releasing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The introduction of sodium alginate (SA) into perovskite solar cells improves the carrier dynamics, stability, and performance by inhibiting nonradiative recombination and retarded charge dynamics.
Notorious nonradiative recombination and retarded charge dynamics corrodes the performance of perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Accordingly, a natural polysaccharide sodium alginate (SA) is introduced into SnO2 colloid solution, developing egg-box structured SnO2 nanoparticles wrapped by ultrathin SA nanolayer to achieve a bottom-up holistic passivation strategy. The active oxygen-containing functional groups with lone pair electrons of SA can coordinate with uncoordinated Sn4+/Pb2+. Meanwhile, hydroxyl groups can form hydrogen bonds with I of perovskite. Additionally, Na+ can fill the cation vacancies in perovskite and electrostatically interacts with the halogen ions, hindering the formation of iodine Frenkel defects. Based on the synergistic effects of various functional groups, SA-modification can simultaneously inhibit the agglomeration of SnO2 nanoparticles, improve carrier dynamics, release tensile stress and promote crystallization of perovskite. Finally, the SA-optimized methylammonium-free (MA-free) device fabiricated entirely in ambient air achieves a champion efficiency up to 23.61%. The optimized devices without encapsulation exhibit better thermal and moisture stability, with the PCE retaining 80.2% of its initial efficiency after 1080 h of thermal aging at 60 degrees C and 91.1% of its initial efficiency after 1440 h at 25% relative humidity, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据