4.1 Article

Association between physical activity status and musculoskeletal pain in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2: Sulcovid-19 survey.

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102878

关键词

Exercise; Musculoskeletal pain; Cross-sectional studies; COVID-19

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the association between physical activity before SARS-Cov-2 infection and musculoskeletal pain after infection. The results showed that sufficient physical activity before infection was associated with reduced likelihood of experiencing pain in the cervical spine after COVID-19. Participants who remained active had lower likelihood of pain in the cervical spine and at least one body site. Becoming inactive increased the likelihood of experiencing pain in the lower limbs after infection.
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the association of physical activity (PA) before SARS-Cov-2 infection with Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain after infection. Methods: We used data from the Sulcovid-19, a longitudinal study. This study was carried out in the city of Rio Grande, in the extreme south of Brazil with individuals who were infected by SARS-Cov-2 between December/2020 and March/2021. Participants were asked on MSK pain in the cervical, thoracic, low back, upper and lower limbs. Three PA variables were built, as follows: 1) any PA (yes or no), 2) sufficient PA (based on WHO recommendations), and 3) PA status before and after COVID-19 (i.e., remained inactive, became inactive, and remained active). Results: Participants reporting sufficient PA levels were less likely to experience pain in the cervical (PR 0.70, 0.53-0.92 95% CI) after COVID-19. Those who remained active were less likely to experience pain in the cervical spine and in at least one body site. Becoming inactive increased the likelihood of experiencing pain in the lower limbs after infection by 30%. Conclusions: Continuous PA practice regardless SARS-Cov-2 infection showed important protection effect for MSK as a consequence of infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据