3.8 Article

Tone of narrative disclosures and earnings management: UK evidence

期刊

ADVANCES IN ACCOUNTING
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.adiac.2023.100710

关键词

Textual analysis; Tone of narrative disclosures; Earnings management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between the tone of narrative disclosures and engagement in earnings management activities, finding a significant association between the tone and the prevalence of earnings management. The study also reveals that manipulating firms tend to use less negative tone to hide fraudulent practices, while non-manipulating firms tend to use more positive tone to mask their involvement in managing earnings. Furthermore, the study shows a positive association between earnings management and net tone with abnormal market returns for non-manipulating firms.
This paper investigates whether a relationship exists between the tone of narrative disclosures and engagement in earnings management activities. Using FTSE all-share nonfinancial firms, our estimates show a significant association between the tone of narrative disclosure (measured by the percentage of positive words, negative words, and net tone) and the prevalence of earnings management. The results also suggest that manipulating firms, which represent extreme cases of earnings management, are more likely to use less negative tone to conceal their fraudulent practices. In contrast, non-manipulating firms tend to use more positive tone to mask their involvement in managing earnings. Additionally, the paper examines the market reaction to both earnings management and the tone of narrative disclosure. The findings reveal that earnings management and net tone are positively associated with abnormal market returns for non-manipulating firms, but have no significant association for manipulating firms. Overall, the paper highlights the important role of the tone of narrative disclosures in providing clarity to the numbers presented in annual reports.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据