4.0 Review

Recent developments and future perspectives on energy storage and conversion applications of nickel molybdates

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/est2.432

关键词

battery; binary oxide; heterostructure; molybdate; nanostructured material; supercapacitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transition metal oxides with two different cations in the same crystal structure are considered superior catalysts due to the synergistic effects and increased active site availability. Molybdate-based compounds, particularly nanostructured nickel molybdate (NiMoO4), have significant industrial importance in catalysis, supercapacitance, nuclear medicine, and calorimetry. Engineering NiMoO4 at different scales has greatly enhanced its catalytic performance through improved redox reaction kinetics. This review provides a comprehensive perspective on the developments, synthesis routes, and tunability of NiMoO4 for targeted applications.
Transition metal oxides with two different cations in the same crystal structure are considered to perform better as catalysts due to the synergistic effects causing better charge transfer and the availability of more active sites. Chemicals with molybdate anion (MoO4-) have been proven to have vast industrial importance in arenas like catalysis, supercapacitance, nuclear medicine, calorimetry, etc. In particular, nanostructured nickel molybdate (NiMoO4) is a promising entrant as an electrode substance for sophisticated power bank applications, apart from being a catalyst for chemical reactions involving energy conversion. Engineering of NiMoO4 at different scopes has been proven to cause a vast enhancement in the catalytic performance of nanometric NiMoO4 through improvement in redox reaction kinetics during the last couple of decades. This review imparts a precise thought about NiMoO4 considering all its developments in the unearthing of properties, synthesis routes, and analyzing tunability for improvement in attributes towards focused applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据