4.4 Article

Topology Optimization and Wave Propagation of Three-Dimensional Phononic Crystals

出版社

ASME
DOI: 10.1115/1.4054745

关键词

phononic crystals; band gap; generalized plane wave expansion method; topology optimization; wave propagation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phononic crystals are engineered structures with unique acoustic properties that cannot be found in natural materials. These crystals exhibit band gaps where wave propagation is prohibited due to their periodic structure. This article presents a method using a generalized plane wave expansion and voxel-based discretization to calculate the band structures of three-dimensional phononic crystals. The proposed method, integrated with an adaptive genetic algorithm, is used for topological optimization of constituent distribution to maximize the width of the band gap. Numerical results validate the effectiveness of the method for optimizing a cubic phononic crystal, and the eigenmodes of the optimized crystal are investigated to better understand the mechanism of band gap broadening.
Phononic crystals are periodically engineered structures with special acoustic properties that natural materials cannot have. One typical feature of phononic crystals is the emergence of band gaps wherein the wave propagation is prohibited due to the spatial periodicity of constituents. This article presents a generalized plane wave expansion method (GPWEM) and a voxel-based discretization technique to calculate the band structures of given three-dimensional phononic crystals. Integrated with the adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA), the proposed method is used to perform topological optimization of constituent distribution to achieve maximized band gap width. Numerical results yielded from the optimization of a three-dimensional cubic phononic crystal verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. Eigenmodes of the phononic crystal with the optimized topology are investigated for a better understanding of the mechanism of band gap broadening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据