4.7 Article

Room-Temperature Response Performance of Coupled Doped-Well Quantum Cascade Detectors with Array Structure

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano13010110

关键词

QCD; responsivity; energy level interactions; electron concentration; doping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two different-structured quantum cascade detectors (QCDs) were prepared, and the detectivity reached 10(9) cm center dot Hz(1/2)/W at room temperature. By fitting the overlap integral (OI) and oscillator strength (OS) between different energy levels under a series of applied biases, the influence of energy level interaction on the response performance was revealed. The redistribution of electrons in the cascade structure at room temperatures was established. The coupled doped-well QCD showed even better responsivity and detectivity, providing a novel strategy to understand the mechanisms that affect response performance and expand the application range of QCDs for long-wave infrared (LWIR) detection.
Energy level interaction and electron concentration are crucial aspects that affect the response performance of quantum cascade detectors (QCDs). In this work, two different-structured array QCDs are prepared, and the detectivity reaches 10(9) cm center dot Hz(1/2)/W at room temperature. The overlap integral (OI) and oscillator strength (OS) between different energy levels under a series of applied biases are fitted and reveal the influence of energy level interaction on the response performance. The redistribution of electrons in the cascade structure at room temperatures is established. The coupled doped-well structure shows a higher electron concentration at room temperature, which represents a high absorption efficiency in the active region. Even better responsivity and detectivity are exhibited in the coupled doped-well QCD. These results offer a novel strategy to understand the mechanisms that affect response performance and expand the application range of QCDs for long-wave infrared (LWIR) detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据