4.6 Article

Evaluation of specificity and sensitivity of IRT/IRT protocol in the cystic fibrosis newborn screening program: 6-year experience of three tertiary centers

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 182, 期 3, 页码 1067-1076

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-022-04766-4

关键词

Cutoff; Cystic fibrosis; Immunoreactive trypsinogen; Newborn screening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the cutoff values of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and investigate the relationship between IRT values and clinical characteristics in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). The study included data from children with positive newborn screening (NBS) from 2015 to 2021. Sensitivity and specificity of IRT cutoff values were assessed, and the positive predictive value (PPV) was determined. The study found that while the sensitivity of CF NBS was high, the PPV was significantly lower than expected. Revising the NBS strategy may help overcome false-positive results.
We aimed to evaluate cutoff values of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT)/IRT and determine relationship between IRT values and clinical characteristics of children with cystic fibrosis (CF). This study is cross-sectional study. Data of children with positive newborn screening (NBS) between 2015 and 2021 were evaluated in three pediatric pulmonology centers. Age at admission, sex, gestational age, presence of history of meconium ileus, parental consanguinity, sibling with CF, and doll-like face appearance, first and second IRT values, sweat chloride test, fecal elastase, fecal fat, biochemistry results, and age at CF diagnosis were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity of IRT cutoff values were evaluated. Of 815 children with positive NBS, 58 (7.1%) children were diagnosed with CF. Median values of first and second IRT were 157.2 (103.7-247.6) and 113.0 (84.0-201.5) mu g/L. IRT values used in current protocol, sensitivity was determined as 96.6%, specificity as 17.2% for first IRT, and 96.6% sensitivity, 20.5% specificity for second IRT. Positive predictive value (PPV) was determined as 7.1%. When cutoff value for first IRT was estimated as 116.7 mu g/L, sensitivity was 69.0% and specificity was 69.6%, and when cutoff value was set to 88.7 mu g/L for second IRT, sensitivity was 69.0% and specificity was 69.0%. Area under curve was 0.757 for first and 0.763 for second IRT (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). PPV was calculated as 4.3%. Conclusion:Although sensitivity of CF NBS is high in our country, its PPV is significantly lower than expected from CF NBS programs. False-positive NBS results could have been overcome by revising NBS strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据