3.9 Article

Building partnerships: A case study of physical activity researchers and practitioners collaborating to build evidence to inform the delivery of a workplace step count challenge

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1067127

关键词

worksite; evaluation; intervention; Scotland; collaboration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the partnership between Paths for All and researchers in promoting physical activity. The partnership has evolved and strengthened over time through building trust, and the research activities provide an evidence base for interventions. This collaboration benefits both the organization and researchers.
BackgroundWalking is an integral part of Scotland's National Physical Activity Strategy, and the charity Paths for All's Workplace Step Count Challenge is a flagship programme within this strategy to promote physical activity. Effectively promoting physical activity requires collaborative engagement between stakeholders. However, there is limited guidance on how to do this. The aim of this case study is to share an example of a partnership between Paths for All and researchers to inform the development and delivery of the Workplace Step Count Challenge. MethodAn overview of the partnership, example activities, reflections on opportunities and challenges, and suggestions for future partnership working are considered. ResultsThe partnership has evolved and strengthened over time through building trust. Many of the research activities provide an evidence base for the intervention. This work is mutually beneficial providing support for the work of the organisation, and opportunities for researchers to undertake real world research, leading to formal outputs and funding. The real world nature is challenging to integrate the most robust research designs. Recommendations for developing future partnerships were identified. ConclusionPromoting physical activity effectively requires partnership working, and this paper provides insight into how such partnerships can work to inform future collaborations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据