4.2 Article

Preparation of Doxorubicin- and Psoralen-Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carrier and Its Multidrug Resistance Reversal Study

期刊

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jbt.2016.1513

关键词

Doxorubicin; Psoralen; NLC; Emulsification; Evaporation Method; CCD-RSM; MDR Reversal Study

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273707, 81173215]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [S2013010012880, 2016A030311037]
  3. Ministry of Education in the New Century Excellent Talents [NECT-12-0677]
  4. Science Program of Department of Education of Guangdong [2013KJCX0021, 2015KGJHZ012]
  5. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2014J4500005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug resistance (MDR) is the major cause of tumor chemotherapy failure. This study aimed to combine doxorubicin with the MDR-reversal agent psoralen (PSO) by loading them into a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) to enhance the reversal activity of PSO and DOX. PSO-DOX-NLC was prepared based on the method of emulsification evaporation-low-temperature solidification. A central composite design and response-surface-optimization methodology were adopted to generate the optimal formulation of PSO-DOX-NLC. The encapsulation efficiency, morphology, zeta potential, particle size, in vitro release, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and infrared-spectroscopy properties, and reversal effect of PSO-DOX-NLC were also studied. The NLC prepared for this process was round and uniform in size and zeta potential; it's optimal formulation was 130 mg of lipid, 1.83:1 lecithin-to-lipid ratio, and 2.6% emulsifier. In vitro release data indicated that PSO-DOX-NLC had an apparent slow-release effect. Infrared spectra and DSC data showed that PSO-DOX-NLC may have formed a noncrystalline structure in the NLC system. The IC50 values of PSO/DOX, DOX-NLC, and PSO/DOX-NLC were 2.448, 0.965, and 0.379 mu g/mL respectively, proving that PSO-DOX-NLC can improve the reversal activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据