4.4 Article

Risk adjusted venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following pancreatic surgery

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 604-616

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-023-02775-0

关键词

Pancreatectomy; Prophylaxis; Venous thromboembolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed pancreatectomy cases between 2016 and 2021 and found that using Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis led to a significant reduction in VTE complications without increasing bleeding complications. The study emphasizes the need for standardization in VTE risk assessment and prevention measures to reduce preventable VTE complications and associated morbidity and mortality.
This study analyzes pancreatectomy cases performed between 2016 and 2021 to determine the impact of using Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis on VTE and bleeding complications. This is a retrospective study of cases performed in a single academic health care system, in which Caprini score and VTE prevention measures were determined retroactively and prevention practices binarized as appropriate or not appropriate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed of 1,299 pancreatectomy case. Most patients were stratified as high risk for postoperative VTE. Receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis during admission was associated with a 3-fold reduction in VTE complications (0.82% vs. 2.64%, p=0.01) without increasing bleeding complications. All VTE complications occurring with 30-day (1.2%) and 90-day (2.7%) from hospital discharged occurred in those not receiving appropriate prophylaxis, and discharged bleeding complications were also not associated with receivng appropriate discharged VTE prophylaxis. The findings our the study are significant as it highlights the ongoing need for standardization in VTE risk assessment and prevention measures to increase compliance to risk adjusted VTE prevention practice guidelines, thus reducing preventable VTE complications and potentially associated morbidity and mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据