4.5 Article

Polyculture of Pacific White Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) and Red Seaweed Gracilaria birdiae (Greville) under Different Densities

期刊

FISHES
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fishes8010054

关键词

Litopenaeus vannamei; macroalga; aquaculture; nutrients

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the potential of a polyculture system with Pacific white shrimp and the macroalga Gracilaria birdiae to remove nutrients. Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations initially decreased in the treatments with macroalgae, but the reduction was not sustained. The biomass of G. birdiae remained stable, possibly due to high water turbidity, and there was no economic advantage in using G. birdiae in an integrated multitrophic system with L. vannamei at high density and high water turbidity conditions.
The present study evaluated a polyculture system with Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and the macroalga Gracilaria birdiae and its potential to remove nutrients. The experimental design consisted of a shrimp monoculture of 100 animals/m(2) (T0) and three multitrophic cultures with L. vannamei (100 animals/m(2)) and with G. birdiae at densities of 500 (T500), 1000 (T1000), and 2000 (T2000) g/m(2). Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations decreased at the beginning of the experiment in the treatments with macroalgae, but this reduction was not maintained throughout the cultivation period. The stable values of G. birdiae biomass were perhaps related to the high turbidity of the water. There was an increase in shrimp biomass during cultivation, which reached the final individual averages of 7.5 g (T0), 7.6 g (T500), 5.9 g (T1000), and 7.5 g (T2000), with no significant differences between treatments. Nevertheless, the absence of macroalgae growth provides no added profit for the producer. Thus, there is no economic advantage in using G. birdiae in an integrated multitrophic system with L. vannamei at a high density and conditions of high water turbidity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据