4.5 Article

A Smooth Bidirectional Evolutionary Structural Optimization of Vibrational Structures for Natural Frequency and Dynamic Compliance

期刊

出版社

TECH SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2023.023110

关键词

Topology optimization; smooth bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (SBESO); eigenfrequency optimization; dynamic stiffness optimization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A smooth bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization (SBESO) is proposed for the topological optimization of vibrating continuum structures for natural frequencies and dynamic compliance. The SBESO method removes inefficient elements gradually from the design domain using a weighted function. The frequency optimization and dynamic stiffness optimization are formulated using the SBESO technique.
A smooth bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization (SBESO), as a bidirectional version of SESO is proposed to solve the topological optimization of vibrating continuum structures for natural frequencies and dynamic compliance under the transient load. A weighted function is introduced to regulate the mass and stiffness matrix of an element, which has the inefficient element gradually removed from the design domain as if it were undergoing damage. Aiming at maximizing the natural frequency of a structure, the frequency optimization formulation is proposed using the SBESO technique. The effects of various weight functions including constant, linear and sine functions on structural optimization are compared. With the equivalent static load (ESL) method, the dynamic stiffness optimization of a structure is formulated by the SBESO technique. Numerical examples show that compared with the classic BESO method, the SBESO method can efficiently suppress the excessive element deletion by adjusting the element deletion rate and weight function. It is also found that the proposed SBESO technique can obtain an efficient configuration and smooth boundary and demonstrate the advantages over the classic BESO technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据