Minimally invasive versus open McKeown esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to compare short and mid-term outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE) after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy. MethodsPatients with locally advanced ESCC underwent open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy were retrospectively included from June 2019 to June 2021. The baseline characteristics, pathological data, short-and mid-term outcomes were collected and compared based on the surgical approach. ResultsA total of 35 patients were included in the study. An open procedure was performed for 13 patients (37.1%), and 22 (62.9%) patients underwent MIE after neoadjuvant therapy. Compared with open group, MIE group had shorter operative times (350.8 +/- 117.8 vs. 277.9 +/- 30.2 min, P = 0.009). The total number of resected lymph nodes was not significantly different, but more left recurrent laryngeal lymph nodes were harvested from the Open group (2.6 +/- 3.2 vs. 0.9 +/- 1.7, P = 0.047). The median follow-up time was 1.42 years (range, 0.35-2.59 years) from the first day of treatment. Three patients (8.6%) died during follow-up, one in the open surgery group and two in the MIE group. There were six (17.1%) patients developed recurrence, three in each group. The 2-year cumulative survival rates were 92.3 +/- 7.4% and 89.5 +/- 7.1% for the open and MIE groups, respectively. Overall survival was not different between the two surgical approaches. ConclusionsMIE might be safe and feasible for patients with locally advanced ESCC undergoing neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy.

Automated summary

This study compared short and mid-term outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing open or minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy after neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy. The results showed that the minimally invasive approach had shorter operative times, but there was no significant difference in overall survival between the two surgical approaches.