4.1 Article

Systemic administration of novel engineered AAV capsids facilitates enhanced transgene expression in the macaque CNS

期刊

MED
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 31-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2022.11.002

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, scientists used mRNA-based directed evolution strategy in mice and cynomolgus macaques to identify engineered AAV vectors with increased brain transduction capability and decreased liver tropism. While the macaque-derived variants showed significant improvement in transducing the macaque brain, the mouse-derived variants, both from this study and other groups, were not effective. This study highlights the importance of using appropriate animal models for evaluating novel AAVs intended for CNS delivery.
Background: Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are a promising vehicle for noninvasive gene delivery to the central nervous system via intravenous infusion. However, naturally occurring serotypes have a limited ability to transduce the brain, and translating engineered cap-sids from mice to nonhuman primates has proved challenging.Methods: In this study, we use an mRNA-based directed-evolution strategy in multiple strains of mice as well as a de novo selection in cyn-omolgus macaques to identify families of engineered vectors with increased potency in the brain and decreased tropism for the liver.Findings: We compare the transgene expression capabilities of several engineered vectors and show that while some of our novel macaque -derived variants significantly outperform AAV9 in transducing the ma-caque brain following systemic administration, mouse-derived vari-ants-both those identified in this study and those reported by other groups-universally do not.Conclusions: Together, the results of this work introduce a class of pri-mate-derived engineered AAV capsids with increased therapeutic po-tential and highlight the critical need for using appropriate animal models to both identify and evaluate novel AAVs intended for delivery to the human central nervous system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据