4.8 Article

Self-Assembly Regulated Singlet Oxygen Generation of Heavy-Atom-Free Organic Chromophores

期刊

ACS MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 180-188

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00972

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, researchers achieved modulation of singlet oxygen generation by controlling the self-assembly behaviors of heavy-atom-free BODIPY derivatives. Different assembly behaviors significantly altered the structures and ISC efficiencies of the nanoassemblies, leading to a remarkable distinction in singlet oxygen generation efficiency.
Assembly of organic dyes is an effective way to achieve novel properties that are drastically distinctive from those of monomers. However, achieving well-organized nanostructures through controllable assembly with desired performance remains a challenge. Herein, we present the first example of modulation of singlet oxygen generation through controlling the self-assembly behaviors of heavy-atom-free BODIPY derivatives (1-4) by incorporating different TEG chains on the BODIPY core. Different assembly behaviors remarkably alter the structures and ISC efficiencies of the nanoassemblies, thus leading to a remarkable distinction in singlet oxygen (1O2) generation efficiency. Experimental and theoretical studies suggest these different behaviors are attributed to their different molecular stacking modes, which affect the energy splitting of optically allowed transitions. Significantly, the 1O2 generation rate of assembly 1 is 13.4-fold higher than that of iodo-BODIPY (a traditional heavy-atom effect based photosensitizer), which allows application for photodynamic therapy with excellent phototherapeutic efficacy. This work not only deepens the understanding of the self-assembly effects of organic dyes on the ISC process but also provides a feasible strategy to construct materials with tunable ISC rates through rational selection of the assembly of dyes instead of molecule design and synthesis. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据