4.1 Article

Technological Properties of Orange Sweet Potato Flour Intended for Functional Food Products as Affected by Conventional Drying and Milling Methods

期刊

ACS FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 3, 期 2, 页码 283-291

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.2c00308

关键词

orange sweet potato flour; technological properties; drying temperature; grinding pattern; damaged starch; particle size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of drying temperature and grinding pattern on the properties of orange sweet potato flour (OSPF) and to define its potential application in functional food products. The results showed that drying at different temperatures and using different grinding patterns had significant effects on the hydration, thermal, and pasting properties of OSPF. The combination of drying temperature and grinding pattern was found to be important in determining the technological properties of OSPF.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of drying temperature and grinding pattern on physicochemical, hydration, thermal, and pasting properties of orange sweet potato flour (OSPF) and to define its potential application in functional food products. Air convection drying temperatures (50 and 80 degrees C) and grinding patterns (shear and consecutive shear-impact) were evaluated. Hydration and pasting properties were influenced by the two factors and their interaction. Particle size and damaged starch content are significantly related to technological properties. The results indicated that drying at 80 degrees C and consecutive shear- impact grinding can produce thickening flours, while drying at 50 or 80 degrees C and shear grinding can produce flours with water retention suitable for gluten-free bread-type products with good antioxidant capacity. Additional knowledge provided by these findings is the importance of the combination of drying temperature and grinding pattern in the technological properties of OSPF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据