Experimental Evaluation on Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance of Continuous Steel Stringers

An extensive experimental study evaluated lateral torsional buckling resistance of two-span, continuous, steel beams in a test assembly that included three beam lines, an interior transverse support (floor beam), and transverse diaphragms at the end supports. Funded by the Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC), this study was conducted to better understand continuous stringer behavior so that simplified analyses would better capture their lateral torsional buckling (LTB) behavior. Current practice produces Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LA DOTD) bridge ratings often conservatively controlled by stringer LTB capacity and, in many cases, necessitates posting-thereby imposing significant and often unnecessary operational restrictions. Forty-seven elastic tests were completed. The tests encompassed a variety of unbraced lengths and support conditions with steel diaphragms or timber ties acting as bracing members. The interior beam in the test assembly was loaded orthogonal to its strong axis at the middle of one or both spans using a spreader beam that minimized restraint and prevented the development of follower forces. Tests demonstrated that minimal bracing could significantly increase lateral torsional buckling resistance and justify a higher LTB resistance than what is currently used. Although the tests were conducted on assemblies used to represent a bridge floor system, the results provided an extensive set of valuable data that could be used by structural steel researchers interested in examining flexural resistance of continuous beams.

Automated summary

An extensive experimental study was conducted to evaluate the lateral torsional buckling resistance of two-span continuous steel beams. The results showed that minimal bracing can significantly increase the buckling resistance and justify higher capacity ratings for continuous stringers than what is currently used.