4.5 Article

RETURNING TO WORK AFTER STROKE: ASSOCIATIONS WITH COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE, MOTIVATION, PERCEIVED WORKING ABILITY AND BARRIERS

期刊

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2576

关键词

stroke; return-to-work; cognitive performance; self-perceived working ability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the return-to-work status of stroke patients and its associations with cognitive performance, motivation, perceived working ability, and self-perceived barriers. The results show that cognitive performance is significantly connected with returning to work, and it can predict the likelihood of returning to work within 6 months and 12 months after the initial assessment.
Objective: To investigate post-stroke return-towork and its associations with cognitive performance, motivation, perceived working ability, and self-perceived barriers to returning to work. Design: Prospective cohort study of a clinical sample. Subjects and methods: Participants were 77 stroke patients younger than age 69 years. Assessment included a cognitive screening method for stroke patients (CoMet), a ques tionnaire regarding workrelated matters, and a question regarding motivation to return to work. A predictive model of return-towork was built, and how participants managed in their working life was examined. Results: Cognitive performance was significantly connected with returning to work. Three of the 5 individuals who dropped out of working life had cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive performance predicted 80% of those who had not returned and 37% of those who had returned by 6 months after the initial assessment. Self-perceived working ability and barriers predicted 64% of those who had not returned and 78% of those who had returned at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion: Cognitive performance seems to be a crucial predictor of return-to-work post-stroke, but individuals' own evaluations of their working capabilities are also important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据